I think from the start that this was a signal to him that he will be taken out of this race by any means necessary if he becomes a real threat next year.
He's spending something like 30% of what he raises for his campaign on private security so this is another reason he's being denied what he's clearly supposed to receive.
You didn't mention RFK Jr's support for the funding and arming of ongoing Israeli terror and the multiple killings of innocent Palestinians. If RFK ever becomes President, state sponsored terror will continue unabated if not worsen, it seems. Please address the elephant in the room. Thanks.
This piece does not address any specific policies of Mr. Kennedy. And no matter what his position is on any topic, it certainly does not mean he is not worthy of being protected.
It's definitely a glaring weak point, but it's something that has been the same ol' policy for both political parties for decades. The potential positives of what he could do (which he'll never be allowed to-- I think all out violent revolution will become inevitable in this country at some point in the future but no idea when) far outweigh this negative. The issue of war & terror are a global strategy that's tied up with the financial rulers and no leader of any country can ever cross these people without dire consequences.
RFK, Jr's support of the Gaza genocide lost me as well. That aside, I agree that it is a complete travesty of justice for him not to have equal protection to other viable candidates. The deep state is not even bothering to hide their nefariousness.
I think from the start that this was a signal to him that he will be taken out of this race by any means necessary if he becomes a real threat next year.
Private security might be wiser. Trust the government?
He's spending something like 30% of what he raises for his campaign on private security so this is another reason he's being denied what he's clearly supposed to receive.
You didn't mention RFK Jr's support for the funding and arming of ongoing Israeli terror and the multiple killings of innocent Palestinians. If RFK ever becomes President, state sponsored terror will continue unabated if not worsen, it seems. Please address the elephant in the room. Thanks.
This piece does not address any specific policies of Mr. Kennedy. And no matter what his position is on any topic, it certainly does not mean he is not worthy of being protected.
I agree it doesn't address it and I agree he should be protected. But the elephant remains and it never forgets.
Must you talk about elephants? How about the elephants in Ukraine and in Afghanistan? There are so many elephants it's ridiculous.
It's definitely a glaring weak point, but it's something that has been the same ol' policy for both political parties for decades. The potential positives of what he could do (which he'll never be allowed to-- I think all out violent revolution will become inevitable in this country at some point in the future but no idea when) far outweigh this negative. The issue of war & terror are a global strategy that's tied up with the financial rulers and no leader of any country can ever cross these people without dire consequences.
RFK, Jr's support of the Gaza genocide lost me as well. That aside, I agree that it is a complete travesty of justice for him not to have equal protection to other viable candidates. The deep state is not even bothering to hide their nefariousness.