Can you clarify? When was the incidence of autism one in 10,0000?
Dr. Hooker: The incidence of autism has increased dramatically since the early 1980s. It was estimated as anywhere between one in 10,000 to one in 2000, at the highest level. By the time my son was diagnosed in 1999, it was one in 250. It had increased dramatically, almost tenfold in that short period of time.
Mark, my understanding is that pre-1980 because there were so few cases and little understanding of autism, there were only estimates - perhaps better termed guesstimates. Thus the wide range of hypothetical numbers. The dramatic increase after the mid-1980's is verifiable. Not much more information - but hope that helps.
Since hearing many experts especially the cancelled ones talk about the whole "covid" thing I am now against ALL vaxxes. They are a product of the Rockefeller allopathic model of medicine. They culminated in these so called vaccines being forced on current populations - and which don't even fit the definition of vaccines until they changed the definition in 2021 to exclude the criteria by which they were initially created. For the history of how medicine got to this point go to 18:57mins into the video at https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/rockefeller-medicine:de OR If you have a spare hour and a quarter watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOa1foc5IXI also at https://rumble.com/v1pjbt7-more-deadly-than-war-g-edward-griffin.html
Considering my issues, I spent an age thinking about this subject. I came up with a model. Cognitively, this model comes down to focus and factor collection - basically information received first past the post. It's an interesting question, what information does the autist receive compared to the neurotypical? Might different information lead to different behaviours?
I think the autist receives a different set of information and in a different order - as in the acquisition of factors via disassembly - each frame of thought naturally reframing things into more and more specific objects - hardly ideal and that being because what is in front is just too apparent. Have we ever asked ourselves the one basic question of our minds - what is our cognitive bias? Frame by frame do we acquire one factor after another or do take one factor and cut it in half leading to more subfactors? I think the autist skews heavily towards the latter. Certainly, I've watched myself very carefully. The optimum might be 50/50 at a guess.
Of course, autism is a complex condition and there is far more to it than this. But this basic model leads to strategies.
1. Supposing. Yes, I got stuck badly in my late teens. I couldn't understand what was going on around me it was that bad so I had to teach myself how to think over the years. I had the literal component but I was stuck on that. When I couldn't understand, I would desperately search for more information. I was thinking wrong and had a bad value system. I just needed the second component, a supposition, generated through past experience and my own voice. I needed to manually tell myself what the situation might be so my brain could run the link between this supposition and the literal. It is a different cognitive style. I needed both. I made great progress, I understood things much better and saved myself a lot of cognitive effort and stress. No therapist. Nothing. Just me.
2. There is something which I call neutral positioning. I notice that I "dive in" a lot leading to overcommittals, fixations and a lack of awareness elsewhere, basically a fragmented, disjoined reality and one where changes are very heavy. Now what you can do is firstly choose a visual point to fixate on as an anchor THEN allow your mind to increase emphasis on the periphery with the anchor still present. I noticed a massive improvement in my cognition. The reality around me appeared smooth and broad and visual stimuli wouldn't be so strong that I would dive into it. It's basically a backup cognition which is elective but only if you know about it! This could help in crowded situations or with lots going on and there is potential for adaption.
There's more I know but nobody talks about these strategies and I find it really strange. Why not see what your mind can do?
Any good thing can be taken to harmful extremes. Example food: Food is a good thing. Extremes lead to obesity or anorexia. In my view this has happened with vaccines. Vaccines started as a good thing, a true miracle drug. Over time, people's trust in modern medical science has been exploited, in order to follow agendas foreign to healthcare i.e., profit, and population control, as a goal of "public health." When speaking of "public health" the health of individuals, bodily autonomy, and right to choose, are not the focus. Rather it is the goals predetermined to be best for the public-group-society, by our societal overlords, individual rights-health be damned. When we have arrived at the point where 76 vaccinations are given to our children, 26 before age 1, it is obvious that a good thing has been taken to a harmful extreme. The growing brain may be able to counteract one shot of mercury but 76, I doubt it.
As an aside, my son exhibited violent tendencies starting as a young child. He was diagnosed with schizophrenia at age 13. I am beginning to suspect a connection between this and childhood vaccinations. Thoughts anyone?
Some vaccines promote the growth of candida in the gut causing issues with carb/sugar cravings. Vaccines could also be a large contributing factor to the childhood obesity.
Love your jabs they are truly a wonder for the profitability of modern medicine.
The bio weapons (covid injections) have been tested by electron microscope and found to have on MNRA or RNA in them the citizens of this world have been lied to! But they found other horrific stuff in them for there trans-human 2030 Agenda!🥲
It seems to me that the way forward is for the government to sponsor and fund a study that delays the administration of the MMR vaccine to a later age or do the same to whichever vaccine is considered highest risk for causing autism. The delay group would ideally be composed completely of family volunteers. The control group would be all of the infants who received the MMR, which matched the volunteer group of infants in terms of SES, Race, Sex, etc. etc. If a difference is found, it would be known within 2-3 years I suspect.
Lastly, I want to ask if the cluster of autism seen among infants of recent Somalian immigrants born in Minnesota occurred after vaccine administration or exposure to antimony in fire retardants in their apartments.?
There is great information now on teaching autistic children to spell words on a computer and communicate their thoughts! Look for articles on “Spellers”.
The Highwire had interviews with a family. Excellent!
Public health: We ran a short-term trial of one brand of [cigarettes] and compared it to another brand of [cigarettes]. There was no difference in outcomes, so therefore [cigarettes] are safe! Trust the science!
Thanks Michael, It's also shocking that this information is not widely disseminated. Even as it's posted here, I feel it is hard for readers to comprehend just how much we have been entranced not to consider the breadth of the autistic epidemic. This is not just about defending RFK, Jr. - every leader needs to be confronted with the information that they have been ignoring in favor of empty proclamations about the safety of vaccines.
Can you clarify? When was the incidence of autism one in 10,0000?
Dr. Hooker: The incidence of autism has increased dramatically since the early 1980s. It was estimated as anywhere between one in 10,000 to one in 2000, at the highest level. By the time my son was diagnosed in 1999, it was one in 250. It had increased dramatically, almost tenfold in that short period of time.
One in 10,000
Mark, my understanding is that pre-1980 because there were so few cases and little understanding of autism, there were only estimates - perhaps better termed guesstimates. Thus the wide range of hypothetical numbers. The dramatic increase after the mid-1980's is verifiable. Not much more information - but hope that helps.
Since hearing many experts especially the cancelled ones talk about the whole "covid" thing I am now against ALL vaxxes. They are a product of the Rockefeller allopathic model of medicine. They culminated in these so called vaccines being forced on current populations - and which don't even fit the definition of vaccines until they changed the definition in 2021 to exclude the criteria by which they were initially created. For the history of how medicine got to this point go to 18:57mins into the video at https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/rockefeller-medicine:de OR If you have a spare hour and a quarter watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOa1foc5IXI also at https://rumble.com/v1pjbt7-more-deadly-than-war-g-edward-griffin.html
Considering my issues, I spent an age thinking about this subject. I came up with a model. Cognitively, this model comes down to focus and factor collection - basically information received first past the post. It's an interesting question, what information does the autist receive compared to the neurotypical? Might different information lead to different behaviours?
I think the autist receives a different set of information and in a different order - as in the acquisition of factors via disassembly - each frame of thought naturally reframing things into more and more specific objects - hardly ideal and that being because what is in front is just too apparent. Have we ever asked ourselves the one basic question of our minds - what is our cognitive bias? Frame by frame do we acquire one factor after another or do take one factor and cut it in half leading to more subfactors? I think the autist skews heavily towards the latter. Certainly, I've watched myself very carefully. The optimum might be 50/50 at a guess.
Of course, autism is a complex condition and there is far more to it than this. But this basic model leads to strategies.
1. Supposing. Yes, I got stuck badly in my late teens. I couldn't understand what was going on around me it was that bad so I had to teach myself how to think over the years. I had the literal component but I was stuck on that. When I couldn't understand, I would desperately search for more information. I was thinking wrong and had a bad value system. I just needed the second component, a supposition, generated through past experience and my own voice. I needed to manually tell myself what the situation might be so my brain could run the link between this supposition and the literal. It is a different cognitive style. I needed both. I made great progress, I understood things much better and saved myself a lot of cognitive effort and stress. No therapist. Nothing. Just me.
2. There is something which I call neutral positioning. I notice that I "dive in" a lot leading to overcommittals, fixations and a lack of awareness elsewhere, basically a fragmented, disjoined reality and one where changes are very heavy. Now what you can do is firstly choose a visual point to fixate on as an anchor THEN allow your mind to increase emphasis on the periphery with the anchor still present. I noticed a massive improvement in my cognition. The reality around me appeared smooth and broad and visual stimuli wouldn't be so strong that I would dive into it. It's basically a backup cognition which is elective but only if you know about it! This could help in crowded situations or with lots going on and there is potential for adaption.
There's more I know but nobody talks about these strategies and I find it really strange. Why not see what your mind can do?
Any good thing can be taken to harmful extremes. Example food: Food is a good thing. Extremes lead to obesity or anorexia. In my view this has happened with vaccines. Vaccines started as a good thing, a true miracle drug. Over time, people's trust in modern medical science has been exploited, in order to follow agendas foreign to healthcare i.e., profit, and population control, as a goal of "public health." When speaking of "public health" the health of individuals, bodily autonomy, and right to choose, are not the focus. Rather it is the goals predetermined to be best for the public-group-society, by our societal overlords, individual rights-health be damned. When we have arrived at the point where 76 vaccinations are given to our children, 26 before age 1, it is obvious that a good thing has been taken to a harmful extreme. The growing brain may be able to counteract one shot of mercury but 76, I doubt it.
As an aside, my son exhibited violent tendencies starting as a young child. He was diagnosed with schizophrenia at age 13. I am beginning to suspect a connection between this and childhood vaccinations. Thoughts anyone?
Some vaccines promote the growth of candida in the gut causing issues with carb/sugar cravings. Vaccines could also be a large contributing factor to the childhood obesity.
Love your jabs they are truly a wonder for the profitability of modern medicine.
The bio weapons (covid injections) have been tested by electron microscope and found to have on MNRA or RNA in them the citizens of this world have been lied to! But they found other horrific stuff in them for there trans-human 2030 Agenda!🥲
Kevin McKernan's work in this is more damning. He found LNP encasing DNA. He talks about it in this interview.
https://rumble.com/embed/v2mb33q/
It seems to me that the way forward is for the government to sponsor and fund a study that delays the administration of the MMR vaccine to a later age or do the same to whichever vaccine is considered highest risk for causing autism. The delay group would ideally be composed completely of family volunteers. The control group would be all of the infants who received the MMR, which matched the volunteer group of infants in terms of SES, Race, Sex, etc. etc. If a difference is found, it would be known within 2-3 years I suspect.
Lastly, I want to ask if the cluster of autism seen among infants of recent Somalian immigrants born in Minnesota occurred after vaccine administration or exposure to antimony in fire retardants in their apartments.?
There is great information now on teaching autistic children to spell words on a computer and communicate their thoughts! Look for articles on “Spellers”.
The Highwire had interviews with a family. Excellent!
Great information 👍 I'm sharing this! Thank you!
Why is there no autism among the Amish, unless they adopt a vaccinated child?
Perfect control group.
Public health: We ran a short-term trial of one brand of [cigarettes] and compared it to another brand of [cigarettes]. There was no difference in outcomes, so therefore [cigarettes] are safe! Trust the science!
🤦♂️
Very informative. Thank you.
Thanks Michael, It's also shocking that this information is not widely disseminated. Even as it's posted here, I feel it is hard for readers to comprehend just how much we have been entranced not to consider the breadth of the autistic epidemic. This is not just about defending RFK, Jr. - every leader needs to be confronted with the information that they have been ignoring in favor of empty proclamations about the safety of vaccines.
#BillGates #FunVaxx please share your research so we can get the #truth out there!
He did. Several times - do a search for it on the page in your browser.
My bad! Thanks.