Vaccines Do Not Provide Immunity
The Objective Is Herd Resilience
“The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.”
Albert Einstein
Expectations for reducing the impact of the COVID-19 virus have diminished dramatically over the last few years; raising important questions. The contradictions in previously disseminated information have become apparent to those willing to observe and consider events. So far inconsistencies are obscured by governments and virtually ignored by mainstream media.
Our human family remains ill. The initial expectations for developing herd immunity to the COVID-19 virus were overly optimistic at best; more likely part of a gigantic sales pitch. The promise of how lockdowns and masks would minimize risks until vaccines arrived to end the pandemic — is a forgotten fairy tale.
The important issues surrounding side effects and damages of the COVID vaccines at times, obscure the complete failure of the worldwide vaccination program.
Accurate statistics have been ignored or manipulated to satisfy agendas. When vaccines were initially made available, case numbers were exaggerated and severe illness and death were sensationalized. Now those who actually have COVID are certainly undercounted, considering the number of people who currently test positive at home — or at a doctor’s office where reporting is minimal.
Simply by observing increased and repeated illness among friends and loved ones over the last year, it is possible to deduce that vaccines have not succeeded in making people less susceptible to any variation of the COVID virus.
The Center for Disease Control initially admitted that among the vaccinated there were breakthrough cases. Slowly this morphed into an admission that the vaccines do not stop transmission. This key turning point in evaluating vaccine effectiveness was glossed over with continuing deceptive pressure — and a perennial campaign for ineffective boosters.
No matter how much obfuscation surrounds the issue of ineffectiveness, details have emerged that deserve repetition and amplification.
An effective vaccine for a virus would not only stop transmission, but it would also ensure the body’s immune system was preventing further infection and illness.
An ineffective vaccine would not only fail to stop viral activity but possibly interfere with the immune system, and likely increase susceptibility to new variants.
The COVID-19 virus, which like others, mutates to ensure its survival, will adapt appropriately in a vaccinated person.
As viruses tend to become less lethal as they evolve, this would account for milder cases within the vaccinated population — rather than an effect of the vaccine.
The unvaccinated exposed to infected vaccinated people have a greater risk of infection, even if they previously had COVID, substantially because of the new variants driven by vaccination.
The single most dramatic finding confirms that in countries where vaccination rates are highest, the greatest number of COVID cases are found. This direct relationship cannot be dismissed.
The flawed logic that is continually provided by governments and media presents a downward spiral without end. The virus is blamed for the failure of vaccines because of its ability to change into new variants; the only recourse is for everyone to get another vaccine!
Despite the possible benefit for patients with pre-existing conditions, which remains questionable, there has been no reasonable justification for continuing vaccination. This is without the risks factored in!
Yet scientists and institutions that would normally evaluate the details of why vaccination did not result in immunity — are silent. There is no comprehensive study examining the ineffectiveness of vaccines or their inability to provide herd immunity.
While there is no public clarification for why people are still repeatedly getting ill, the explanation is elementary. Considering what we witness and the reliable data emerging over the last year, it is reasonable to deduce the response to the pandemic has been an abject failure.
As many people continue to experience cold and flu symptoms and test positive for COVID, the huge debate about vaccine efficacy is coming to the boiling point within the collective unconscious. And though currently below the surface, the momentum for revelation is growing.
Most of those who have resisted vaccines, recognize the very obvious question that arises when the vaccinated are falling ill multiple times. It is only a matter of time before the thin veneer of denial will break into open rebellion against the need for ineffective inoculations.
When this happens, the application of common sense remedies for a powerful flu virus will see the light of day. Diet, supplements, and appropriate medications; with a foundation of sound lifestyle choices — have always been the most effective way to counteract illness.
Herd immunity is not only unattainable with vaccination, it is not what is warranted. Herd resilience to authoritarian schemes and dictates is a more desirable objective.
Reading the trial protocol for pfizer, enrollment was for two age groups, 18-55 and 65-85. Why the ten year gap? No matter. Participants all had to be healthy else they were excluded, even the over 80s of which there were precious few. But inject the vulnerable people who are old and ill and have poor natural defences as top priority. On no evidence. Say what?
Then, they never made a claim that this intervention was to prevent transmission or cause immunity to the 'disease', merely that the 'study trial' was to establish whether the intervention had the capacity to reduce one or two symptoms by one or two days.
They also didn't look at what three or more shots did. They didn't look beyond a couple of months. Then they unblinded the participants and 'offered' the intervention so ther is NO control.
Then, the icing on the cake, they made a press release, no actual data and the figures used were relative risk, not actual risk and Yay! We are saved, let's get a shot in every arm.
The information is there, and always has been. All we need to do is read it for ourselves. Sure, the pfizer document may be almost 2500 pages but there are very important, salient and clear sections which are easy to read which say all this, straight from the horse's mouth.
Oh, and potential/known transmissibility of intervention products by aerosol and body fluids, yup, in there. As is the known/likely damage to redproduction, even though that was explicitly left out. Exclude people with cancer and HIV. Can't find evidence if it's not looked for now, can we. Plausible Deniability.
Read the protocols - then nothing which is unfolding is a surprise. Time well invested. I say that, I only read pfizer in full, and salient parts of moderna and astra zenica. That was well enough for me to know this is All Bad.
Why is there no uproar? Why has it taken so long for these tiny connections to start dribbling out? Because people don't read, they wait for info to trickle down in talking points and then go along with the latest info drop. It's understandable I guess, people have different priorities and time constraints. For me, properly looking at the protocols before I made a decision was priority. My regret is that, as most of us do, in the old days I was also one who trusted and allowed the 'professionals' to advise me what is best to do. Because they are the professionals and they know, right? Except they don't. And I really, really get why so many just can't look, even if they have fears and doubts. The realisation that we are conned, and that it runs so deep and in every aspect of our lives is so utterly painful and defeating it can be too hard to bear. Now I understand why ignorance can be bliss.
These companies do not deserve a proper noun capitalisation to their names. They need to be avoided at all costs. Gargle with salt water, look after your SELF and don't fall for their snake oil.
Thanks.
They aren’t vaccines. And i am not going to let the a-hole globalists win by living in fear of another stupid bug. Bless those who, without 2 university degrees, could smell the swamp of lies for miles!